Read between the lines READ BETWEEN THE LINES. READ BETWEEN THE LINES. Express. Guess about the hidden meaning of what is written, unsaid. But women can read between the lines, and Nadenka perfectly understood what was going on in my soul.(Mamin-Sibiryak. Features from the life of Pepko).
Phrasebook Russian literary language. - M.: Astrel, AST. A. I. Fedorov. 2008 .
See what "Read between the lines" is in other dictionaries:
Read between the lines.- (i.e. by guesswork). See MISTAKE SMART... IN AND. Dal. Proverbs of the Russian people
read between the lines- Cm … Synonym dictionary
Read between the lines- Read between the lines (inosk.) Guess what is not completed, not agreed. Wed But between the lines of his painful creations Did you read that more painful than prison, And more painful than his shame and deprivation Was for him your world of commerce and darkness. ... ... Michelson's Big Explanatory Phraseological Dictionary (original spelling)
read between the lines- (inosk.) to guess what is not completed, not agreed Cf. But between the lines of his painful creations Have you read about what is more painful than prison, And more painful than his shame and deprivation Was for him your world of haggling and darkness. Nadson. In memory of F.M. ... ... Michelson's Big Explanatory Phraseological Dictionary
Read between the lines- Razg. Guess about the hidden meaning of what is written. FSRYA, 462; BMS 1998, 555; 3S 1996, 377; BalSok, 56 … Big dictionary of Russian sayings
read between the lines- Guess about the hidden, veiled, not directly present sense of what is written, said ... Dictionary of many expressions
READ BETWEEN THE LINES. READ BETWEEN THE LINES. Express. Guess about the hidden meaning of what is written, unsaid. But women can read between the lines, and Nadenka perfectly understood what was going on in my soul (Mom's Sibiryak. Features from the life of Pepko) ... Phraseological dictionary of the Russian literary language
READ- read, read, carry. 1. (sov. read and read) what. Perceive what. written speech according to its external signs, letters, etc. (saying aloud or to yourself, silently). Read letters. Read words. Read in syllables. || (owls no) that without additional ... Dictionary Ushakov
read- pronounce, recite, chant; run through, look in, disassemble, decipher, read fluently, expressively, with difficulty, in warehouses. I skimmed through this book. I also looked at magazines. Pushk. On holiday grabs ... ... Synonym dictionary
read- Read in whose hearts guess whose n. thoughts, wishes. The author seemed to read into the hearts of his readers. Read between the lines to read, guessing what the author did not say or what the author wanted to hide. Reading these lines, you read between ... ... Phraseological dictionary of the Russian language
Books
- Northern Oracle. Development of personal magnetism in 28 days. Mystical experience of ecstasy. Tantra - love, spirituality and new sensory experience (number of volumes: 4), Marina Zvinnik. "Northern Oracle. Modern system fortune-telling ". The ancient fortune-telling, which became the starting point for the creation of the Northern Oracle, came to Europe in late XIX century from Arabia. It was called...
Recently, someone asked me: "How to learn to read between the lines?" Great question! Although to some extent funny, because people read the information between the lines all the time without noticing it themselves.
I'll explain what I mean. For example, someone wrote a note. (You yourself have probably seen a similar case, but did not pay attention.) So, the other person finds a note and quickly reads it. At this time, he is in a hurry and thinks about something else, or perhaps he does not consider the note important, but still reads it, and later mentions it with surprise in a conversation:
Why did he write in the note about this and that?
Perhaps you also read the note and
answer him:
What are you talking about? There is nothing on this subject in the note.
Of course there is! It is written right in the first sentence, he answers you.
Then you go for a note, find it and show it to the interlocutor. He reads it and, of course, sees that what he was talking about is not there.
Apparently, this is not the note I read. Probably there were two different notes - this is yours, and I read the second one, - he says, to which you answer:
No, I think it's the only note. You just mixed up its contents.
In fact, your interlocutor perceived what was written between the lines of the note.
Because, in a sense, we all already know how to write between the lines. But this can be done consciously or unconsciously. If you want to consciously write down information between the lines, you need to think about something while you write. When you do it unconsciously, the same thing happens. For example, when you are in a hurry, when your mind is very busy with something - a very emotionally charged thought, feeling, experience ... You are absorbed in them, but remember that you must write a note: “Jim, buy some felt-tip pens and paper for a copy machine ". You write it almost automatically, and the emotionally charged thought that dominates in your consciousness and sensations will be superimposed on this text.
You will not see this information with your eyes, but it is present on the note, and there is even more of it than what is written in letters - because the written message is not charged with emotions, it has very little energy. So it turns out that your emotionally charged thoughts are written between the lines. This is just one example, but it happens very, very often.
I noticed this many years ago. This happened because I manage to be a little detached, unemotional about some topics that mean a lot to most people. I kind of stand on the sidelines and observe what is happening around. And in order to be able to see what is happening, in order to understand even oneself, one must become an almost impassive observer, not emotionally involved. And this is exactly the state that allows you to read between the lines.
If we are emotionally involved, emotionally charged, it will be very difficult for us to read between the lines. You have to be indifferent. When a Tibetan monk is instructed to write information to be hidden on a scroll, he hides it between lines of text. Tibetan texts can be translated into various languages. And so you read such a text, read it, and finally exclaim: “What a confusing chatter! It looks like a politician's speech...” Have you ever heard a politician's speech? They never answer the questions asked, never, but instead chatter until the listeners' brains are completely off. Read translations of Tibetan texts - they look exactly the same, especially if there was a hidden message in the original.
So, suppose you have a page of text, between the lines of which information about the location of the treasure is hidden. If you have been looking for this treasure for a long time, if you are excited and emotionally attached to the result, then you will not be able to read the information between the lines. Consciously you will not read anything. Subconsciously, of course, you still count it, but your conscious mind will not be able to accept it from the subconscious because of your strong emotional arousal.
This is the secret of reading between the lines, including reading Tibetan scrolls. That's how they were written, and that's how they should be read - without emotional involvement. It turns out that a person who spends all his energy on searching for some information, on finding it, studying it, researching it - his involvement closes him to the perception of this very information. First you need to become emotionally indifferent to the subject of research. In other words, here's to you greatest secret: "I don't care, I don't care." You may object that these words alone are not enough.
Of course, it’s not enough just to repeat this phrase, you can’t pretend here, you have to really become indifferent.
It turns out that you are given a card to a treasure worth billions, and you can take the whole treasure for yourself. You put the card on the table - emotions immediately ignite, and you are not able to feel any of the information written between the lines.
That's how unemotional you have to be to be able to decipher this kind of information, and it's certainly a tough job. It is not easy to learn this, but it is possible. By the way, this is also useful in Everyday life- after all, if you want to get rid of something, then you need to remove your emotional charge in relation to this phenomenon; that's the only way to let him go. If there is an emotional charge in relation to something negative, we will constantly talk about it, we will get upset ... The phenomenon is magnetized and remains with us. But once you can become an indifferent observer, it will be released.
As for the word "indifferent", it does not quite fit our description, but we have to use it for lack of more precise terms. I am trying to describe the phenomenon when something truly fantastic lies in front of you, and you remain completely calm. It's just a thing... Whether you take it or not, it doesn't matter to you.
If you can relate in this way to what you don't like, this phenomenon will disappear from your life, because you no longer energize it. This state is necessary for the perception of information contained between the lines.
A lot of information is contained between the lines of my first book, The Messenger. It took a lot of work - while writing the book, I spent many hours in light meditation and many hours in deep meditation. Entered into a state of meditation, then wrote the text, say, half a page, then stopped and started over. And so time after time, time after time.
How can one learn to consciously read the information contained between the lines? While reading a book, subconsciously you still perceive interline information. The subconscious mind reads it, and in a state of meditation, the received information slowly enters the conscious mind. When a person begins to work with love, to send love, a process is set in motion by which much of this information seeps into his conscious mind.
But if you just want to read the interline information, then first read the book in the usual way. Then choose one or two pages to work on. Read them, but in a state of indifference to the meaning of the words. "It doesn't matter" - you just read and allow the emerging emotions to enter your consciousness. Of course, this takes practice.
I will tell you the secret of divination by tea leaves. Most of you probably know what it is: come to a coffee or tea shop, drink a cup of tea, and then you are told by the leaves of tea at the bottom of the cup. Of course, we are talking about real fortune-telling, and not about its imitation. About a fortuneteller who has really learned this art and practices it carefully and diligently. Such a fortuneteller also reads between the lines - and it does not matter whether the words in front of him or the tea leaves are the same.
After all, he does the only thing - perceives. When you drink tea, when you stir it, when you pour boiling water into a cup, thousands of thoughts, sensations, emotions, ideas, hopes, dreams, fears, inspirations rush inside you ... And traces of this remain on everything that you do with the outside world. . Tea leaves are stacked in a certain way, just like water is very susceptible to magnetic impulses and keeps them for a long time. All tea molecules line up in a certain way. And when a fortuneteller or a fortuneteller takes a cup and reads fortunes on it, they read the information you left. And that is reading between the lines.
It doesn't matter if it's words or tea leaves. Take some stones! If you take a bucket of stones and lay them out, like words, on several “pages”, then it will seem to someone that these are just stones that do not contain any information. But between the lines of this stone "text" contains a huge amount of information.
I call this phenomenon reading between the lines, because it suits it best. I don't know what else to call it... I don't want to use the term "psychic ability" because it's not. The information is contained in how each stone is laid; each of them keeps your magnetic imprint, the imprint of your thoughts, sensations, emotions - everything that happened in you.
You may ask: “What about the past? How does a fortuneteller by tea leaves look into the past? The fact is that the past, present and future are one and the same. Their separation is just an illusion that disappears when you read between the lines. The only thing that is related to time is the words that are written on paper - they are arranged in temporal order. But if you take a closer look at this, you will understand that words can write about the past, present and future. So, they are related not only to the moment "now"? The same is true for tea leaves, for stones, for bones (which are thrown on the fortune-telling table), for cards ... It all comes down to one thing - to reading between the lines.
Let's get back to the Tibetan scrolls - they contain information written between the lines, and not everyone knows how to decipher it. Moreover, one does not even need to know the Tibetan language in order to read the information contained between the lines of the scroll. Yes, you do not need to understand the language in which the text is written, because the words of which it consists have nothing to do with what is written between the lines. We get a great way to hide information. Highly effective method- after all, it will be impossible for someone who will strongly want to seize information to do this (strong emotions will interfere). Nicely crafted!
Do you always think about what you are writing when you are writing a letter to someone? I'm not sure, because we self-censor most of our thoughts.
And that's one of the reasons I don't allow my books to be heavily edited. And especially the book The Messenger, my first. Once I gave it for editing, after which I had to restore it, which was very difficult. After all, if you give the text to a person who is not versed in the topic, then he will redo everything according to his own understanding. And it's like after you have laid the stones on the ground, someone will come and shift them in their own way. Thus, adding your interline information. If this person did not have the best day, if his wife left him (or the husband left, if this is a woman), then they will leave their emotions between the lines. That's why I'm so strict about editing my lyrics. And I always ask translators to translate them as closely as possible to the original, exactly what I wrote.
If you don't read English and want to try reading between the lines, pick up an English book. (Whether you can read it or not doesn't matter, really.) This is the easiest way to learn to read between the lines, by the way. After all, attention is not distracted by the meaning of the words, you just continue to read - as if you know how to read these words. Keep going and you'll get a little... bored after a while. And boredom means “not important, uninteresting, unemotional”, because reading becomes monotonous. This is exactly what we need. When reading becomes monotonous, boring, uninteresting, then you let go of tension, and information enters your conscious mind more easily. This is possible because with the onset of boredom, the conscious mind opens up a little and allows what normally blocks it to enter. He seems to be saying, “Give me something! I agree to anything!” - that's where the information comes in.
Again, when you practice reading between the lines of a heavily edited book, you can guess what will happen. I have seen how the text created by the author went through editing. I must confess that it was no longer the same text.
As for grammar, punctuation and abbreviations, remember this thing: writing is an art that is closely related to the one who writes. The accepted attitude in our society towards spelling: “Everything must be according to the rules, all periods and commas in their places” is like ordering an artist to use only two colors. “From now on, artists are allowed to use only two colors and paint with a brush only from left to right!” It's funny, because the picture is created by the artist himself, it is practically a part of him. You can't edit a painting, it's like going to Picasso and saying, “You know, it's not bad, but there are too many straight lines and not enough curves. Therefore, instead of this line, we will draw such a curve, instead of this one, a left arc, and instead of this, a curved line. Just a couple of movements - and there is no more Picasso painting! Do you understand? Likewise, writing is a deeply personal pursuit.
Of course, if you are a lawyer and write a paper for the court, it is clear that it must be written according to a certain template. But if you're writing something else - a story, a letter, something about yourself, whatever - then don't let it be edited. Wrong will be the one who says: "Not bad, but you need to edit." Why? Because he does not understand the meaning of the words written on paper and what they become.
Such a page with words is a picture. It may have only one color - black, but this is a picture drawn by the arrangement of proposals. At school, everyone learns to put words in the same order, to write them the same way. How will this affect the picture - destroy it? No, it will not destroy - but it will change. And, of course, it will introduce noise into the interline information. After all, let's take a writer - here he writes a book one, two, half a page a day. Each of these pages is different from all the others, each of them is unique, and each captures certain emotions. The manuscript gets to the editor, who wants to edit it. Of course, it's up to you to choose what you like - sleek text or source text with original content.
The conclusion is as follows: you should not edit everything that comes to hand. And when you write something, leave it as it is, let this text be in its original form. (Of course, this does not apply to formalized legal documents.)
Someday this will be taught in school. Although everyone already reads between the lines in everyday life, and if you look closely, you will notice this. For example, a person reads some ordinary text and says: “Something is wrong with this text, I can’t explain it, but I don’t like it.” In many cases, this does not refer to what is written in words, but to the interline content. Editing can remove it. If you make enough corrections, then the interline text will no longer be read. But when the text gets too heavily edited and the interline content turns into a mess, it often just becomes uninteresting to read.
I have noticed that the books of some popular writers are arranged in such a way that they write smooth texts in a style that readers like. At the same time, information organized in a similar way also gets between the lines. The result is a candy with a very delicate filling. Such authors become very popular, unless their texts are destroyed by editing.
Of course, editing can be gentle - correct typos in words, place commas where necessary. Such editing will not destroy or mix up the interline information...
One way or another, books that contain soothing and encouraging information between the lines are very popular. You want to read and read such a book. Moreover, I even want to press it to my chest - after all, it has such pleasant interline information.
So I told you about the information between the lines. Hope you are satisfied. See you next time!
Read between the lines Read between the lines (foreign language) guess what is not completed, not agreed. Wed But between the lines his morbid creations Did you read you are talking about what is more painful than prison, And more painful than his shame and deprivation Was for him your world of haggling and darkness. Nadson. Memory j. M. Dostoevsky. Wed The words are still the same, but as if the meaning is different, and as if between these lines I read i invisible lines. Gr. A. Tolstoy. Don Juan. one. Wed Literature (in pre-reform times) itself was filled with a slavish spirit and infected its readers with the same spirit. On the one hand, allegories appeared, on the other, the art of understanding these allegories, the art read between the lines. Saltykov. Unfinished conversations. 4. Wed I carped at the words read between the lines, tried to find a mysterious meaning, hints ... Dostoevsky. Notes from Dead. Houses. 2, 10. Wed On between printed lines Read spiritual eyes Another line... A. S. Pushkin. Evg. Onigin, 8, 36. Wed Ovid. Remed. Am. 360. Cm. Allegory. Cm. Reform.
read between the lines is:
read between the lines foreign language) - guess what is not completed, not agreed Wed But between the lines his painful creations Have you read you are talking about what is more painful than prison, And more painful than his shame and deprivation Was for him your world of haggling and darkness. Nadson. In memory of F.M. Dostoevsky. Wed The words are still the same, but as if the meaning is different, and as if between these lines I read i invisible lines. Gr. A. Tolstoy. Don Juan. one. Wed Literature (in pre-reform times) itself was filled with a slavish spirit and infected its readers with the same spirit. On the one hand, allegories appeared, on the other, the art of understanding these allegories, the art read between the lines. Saltykov. Unfinished conversations. 4. Wed I carped about the words read between the lines, tried to find a mysterious meaning, hints ... Dostoevsky. Notes from Dead. Houses. 2, 10. Wed He between printed lines Was reading spiritual eyes Other lines... A.S. Pushkin. Evg. Onegin, 8, 36. Wed Sed tu ingenio verbis concipe plura meis. Ovid. Remed. Am. 360. Cm. allegory. Cm. reform.Russian thought and speech. Yours and someone else's. Experience of Russian phraseology. Collection of figurative words and parables. T.T. 1-2. Walking and well-aimed words. Collection of Russian and foreign quotations, proverbs, sayings, proverbial expressions and individual words. SPb., type. Ak. Sciences.. M. I. Mikhelson. 1896-1912.
What does the phrase "read between the lines" mean?
and if they tell you that you are reading between the lines, does this mean you do not see the point, or vice versa, do you see the whole truth? - more than a year agoRead between the lines - this is a stable expression already. It is used quite often in Russian and means that the interlocutor is offered to guess what is not actually written, but is implied in the text from the context or any hints.
I believe that if you read the letters, the lines and did not understand what is written, then they tell you to read between the lines, like maybe then you will understand if you do not understand what is written, then read the void that is between the lines. Or if you read a book, they ask you what the book is about, and you answer something that is in no way related to this book, then they say that you read the book between the lines?
Kacevalova
In my understanding, the saying "Read between the lines" means they want to say something or give hints, for example, they don’t want to offend or simply can’t say it directly, then the person to whom this applies must understand everything at once, at first glance, a word or deed in relation to him.
The phraseological expression "read / read between the lines" means the ability to understand what is left unsaid and not written, but is implied. Reading between the lines is the ability to understand secret meaning written or spoken aloud. In the old days, due to strict censorship, writers were forced to write about something not openly, but allegorically, using Aesopian language. In a private letter, people could also resort to such a trick when they wanted to convey something secret, not intended for all ears, to convey to their addressee. That's when they began to say "read between the lines."
Ludwigo
This phrase is often used in modern Russian and means that a person must not only understand literal meaning some word, event, book, film, etc., but also portable, hidden, not visible, obviously, clearly, transparently, superficially. This is a vision and understanding of something broadly, using your life experience and knowledge, because it is sometimes very difficult to guess. In other words, it is the knowledge of the secret meaning of things.
When they say "read between the lines", they want to draw attention to the hidden meaning in the written text or oral expression.
There is an opinion that once in secret letters between the lines they wrote a secret message with invisible ink, for example, like milk, then when heated over a fire, a hidden text appeared.
To read between the lines, in my opinion, to understand the meaning of what is read. Take into account not only the direct meaning of words and sentences, but reveal the essence and meaning of what is written or said. It is not always possible to say directly, you have to give hints so that a person can guess.
Strymbrym
Reading between the lines means looking for hidden meaning. This phrase is used in the sense that it is important not only to read what is written, but somewhere and guess what the author of the letter or text really wanted to say.
What does it mean to read between the lines?
With an example please
Galina Avanesova
"Read between the lines" - to perceive not what is written, but what is meant or what the reader himself can easily guess.
The best example is the literal "lesson" of reading "between the lines" taught by one of the heroes of one of the heroines of Solzhenitsyn's First Circle.
I quote from memory: in Moscow (the hero reads aloud) there are 1,380 more nurseries opened than in all of Western Europe. Understand (the reader explains) - all young mothers in Europe have the financial opportunity to stay at home with infants, the Soviet mother two weeks after giving birth - a march to the machine.
Or another example, also newspaper and magazine information: 407 wounded were taken from the battlefield and placed in hospitals; 623 people died in this hardest battle - a lie, because the number of dead accounts for much (by an order of magnitude) more the wounded.
From personal correspondence during the Great Terror: "And Vasil Petrovich went to live with his brother ...", and the correspondent knows that the "brother" is in the Gulag or was shot.
I hope the above examples are more than illustrative.
This means to see the hidden meaning embedded by the author in his work. For example, many listening to Vysotsky's "Hunting for Wolves" associate wolves with dying soldiers, projecting each line not onto the world of wolves. but to the human world.
This means that you need to understand the thoughts of the author. What did he want to say, what did he think about, what bothered him and, finally, what prompted him to write the work (determine the purpose and root cause). For example, you can not talk directly about the problems of the state, but simply show a character who died of starvation. And you need to "read between the lines" - why the protagonist dies? because there were very difficult times, because the state refused to help, etc. I’ll explain it better with a specific example, but for now this is how it is.
What does the phrase "read between the lines" mean? See the hidden meaning?
Alexey Popov
To read between the lines means to see much deeper than what is written or said, to see the hidden meaning. To understand what was meant by saying this or that, to see the secret meaning of what was written. To understand what was meant by saying this or that, to see the secret meaning of what was written. That is, the most important thing is not said in plain text, but only implied. Now, if you understand what is meant, then they say that you read it between the lines. . For example, it is unethical to say to overstayed guests that it would be time to know the honor, so the hostess speaks about this with this hidden meaning. “Tell me, what time is it now? "And the guests should read between the lines if it's time to go home. But often we see hidden meaning where there is none. If there is a desire hidden meaning can be found in every message. And this often leads to various kinds of conflicts and misunderstandings.
I stumbled upon reading between the lines many years ago, and this skill has been extremely useful to me. I'll talk about it briefly, because sometimes the simpler the better. The biggest drawback of our speech is that it is impossible to find words to explain such concepts as the universe, time, space, dimensions, consciousness.
But, as usually happens in Life, someone finds a way around the limitations. The best way I can explain it is that every spoken or written word has a vibration - and something else that I can't explain because I don't really know what it is. However, if you put certain words next to each other, they will create a special vibration. Each word vibrates on its own note, each pair of words, vibrating, creates a new consonance. In an ordinary sentence, the vibration of each word and the entire sentence does not change unless the words are changed. But there are completely different sentences - they also sound both words and the whole sentence - but with one note. Such a sentence seems to sing a song, telling a story that exists beyond what is written on paper.
I would love to explain to you the mechanism of this process, but, unfortunately, I do not know it. However, I can read between the lines, or rather, I know how to get information from the subconscious.
Let me give you an example that should be familiar to you. Have you ever sat while reading something, a book or a magazine, and then, after a period of time, seemed to wake up from a dream-like state and find that you do not remember the contents of the pages you just read? It was like you were on auto-pilot—one part of your mind was reading and the other part was awake, or something like that. This means that while reading you met one of these sentences, while your mind was in the right state, and therefore the subconscious mind made an attempt to convey the information contained in that sentence. If the subconscious gives you information in symbols, then everything may seem like a dream, in which fragments of the surrounding reality will be woven, and then you should separate one from the other.
It is one thing to read between the lines and quite another to write in this way. I think only a few people in the whole world can do it. And to learn such an art, it will probably take a lifetime. I found that the largest concentration of people who can do this are among the Tibetans. And language doesn't seem to matter. Even if you can't read in a particular language, you can still read text in it between the lines. Reading a book in a foreign language is just the easiest way to learn to read between the lines. Of course, a book written in this way is needed. Spiritual books written in Tibetan are perfect. That is the way I learned it. The conscious mind becomes bored with reading what it cannot read, and at some stage the control passes to the subconscious. You will probably find yourself falling into a dream-like state. At the end, you should remember what you saw in a dream and even write it down so that you can analyze it later. You will be extremely surprised by what you find. Another way to learn and practice is to allow yourself to “float away” while reading. This is best done when re-reading a book or text. Of course, if you are carried away in thoughts about everyday worries, then you need to return. I imagine I am talking to another part of myself. I believe that she is my subconscious. As I read, I allow myself to float and return. I read, I listen, I read again, and so on. This is much easier than my story might seem.
On the shelves of bookstores there are many books in which information is written between the lines. It's interesting that even though people can't write between the lines, it still happens, especially with channeling or meditating writers. Especially if they are meditating just before picking up the pen. I have also noticed that in any book translated from Tibetan into English by someone who has achieved sufficient skill in meditation, the information written between the lines goes into new language. I think this is amazing! Any book written by Alice Bailey can serve as an excellent example. There is so much information between the lines that it can easily take four or five months to read one book. Also, among many others, you can pay attention to the books written by Seth, Sanaya Roman, Richard Bach. Each book contains a different amount of information between the lines, although it seems to have increased over the last few years from 1995 to 1998 and beyond.
The next time you receive a letter from someone, you can try to read the information contained between its lines. Sometimes people write about one thing and think about another. For some reason, their thoughts show up in what I call "between the lines."
Do you think this information will make reading more interesting?
It is no coincidence that I placed the story about reading between the lines in this place. I could report the reason for this, but then it would not be so interesting.