Why is culture of behavior so important? It depends on its level how outsiders will treat you - as a pleasant, friendly person or as an arrogant, ill-mannered boor.
The ability to behave “in public” culturally, correctly and appropriately to the situation has a beneficial effect on both your career and friendships.
“Being cultured” – what does it mean?
External and internal cultures are not necessarily closely related; sometimes they even contradict each other.
Thus, an individual who is famous for his rude and ill-mannered behavior may turn out to be the owner of a rich spiritual world and an excellent education.
And, on the contrary, a polite and sympathetic comrade who observes etiquette to the last word, from the inside is empty, ignorant, unprofessional and immoral.
External culture of behavior is the interaction of an individual with his environment. It is expressed in contacts with the world - colleagues, friends, family, in compliance with the rules of etiquette and other social norms.
These are everyday forms of our behavior: in a word, everything that we do when we find ourselves inside the world around us, and even long before this moment. 
Preparing for contact with society (hygiene, choosing clothes, putting your appearance in order) also counts!
One should not think of external culture as something artificial and superficial. It is absorbed by a person from childhood in the course of upbringing, training, and communication.
Many actions are programmed in us, and we do not hesitate to comply with certain behavioral norms - we say hello, wash our faces, thank them, work hard, give way, offer help.
For many, competent interaction with society occurs organically and naturally, because it is instilled almost from birth.
These are a kind of “rules of life” - respect your elders, show politeness and tact, be responsible, don’t be rude, don’t be late, ask permission, and the like.
Ideally, external and internal cultures complement and harmoniously highlight each other’s best sides.
The beauty of the soul, high moral standards, morality and education must coexist with visual grooming, competent speech and a courteous attitude towards others.
It is not for nothing that it is believed that a truly good person is beautiful from all sides.
What does a culture of behavior include?
It is most clearly expressed in interactions with the team - at work, at university, at school. What else does culture of behavior mean?
1. Actions of an individual in a public place (in a park and transport, in line, in a bank, at a bus stop). Ways to resolve conflicts with surrounding strangers.
2. Attitude to work and to nature, responsibility, care for the environment.
3. Household culture – fulfillment of personal needs, organization of leisure time.
7. Hygiene, external neatness, clothing style appropriate to the occasion.
As you already understand, external culture is not just how we treat other people.
If an individual violates obligations and misses deadlines at work, grimaces on the bus and hurls curses, does not say hello back and does not wash clothes for years, throws garbage past the trash can and plucks a neighbor’s flowerbed - this is also a culture of behavior. More precisely, its absence.
Cultural behavior in society
Ways of interacting with society are formed from a young age.
The following have a special influence on the emerging culture of behavior:
- Parenting
- National culture, mentality
- An example set by loved ones
In addition, a person’s behavior is indirectly influenced by religious and racial affiliation, character, education received, degree of financial security, social circle and lifestyle.
And the developed society itself teaches us to act one way or another, introducing modern principles of comfortable coexistence into our consciousness.
You need to understand that in the Middle Ages or during antiquity, the rules of behavior in society were completely different!
Having learned to comply with the laws that exist in the world around us, the child becomes a full-fledged person. He enters a team, a society, already able to behave appropriately to the situation.
The norms that are ingrained into a person at a young age are quite natural and understandable. After all, in the end, they are all eloquent manifestations of Humanity as such.
Morality is the desire of an individual to evaluate conscious actions and human states on the basis of a set of conscious norms of behavior inherent in a particular individual. The expression of the ideas of a morally developed person is conscience. These are the deep laws of a decent human life. Morality is an individual’s idea of evil and good, the ability to competently assess the situation and determine the typical style of behavior in it. Each individual has his own criteria of morality. It forms a certain code of relations with a person and the environment as a whole, based on mutual understanding and humanism.
What is morality
Morality is an integral characteristic of the individual, which is the cognitive basis for the formation of a morally healthy personality: socially oriented, adequately assessing the situation, having an established set of values. In today's society, the definition of morality is in general use as a synonym for the concept of morality. The etymological features of this concept show its origin from the word “character” - character. The first semantic definition of the concept of morality was published in 1789 - “Dictionary of the Russian Academy”.
The concept of morality combines a certain set of personality qualities of the subject. What is paramount is honesty, kindness, compassion, decency, hard work, generosity, and reliability. Analyzing morality as a personal property, it should be mentioned that everyone is able to bring their own qualities to this concept. For people with different types of professions, morality is formed by a different set of qualities. A soldier must be brave, a fair judge, a teacher. Based on the formed moral qualities, the directions of behavior of the subject in society are formed. The subjective attitude of the individual plays a significant role in assessing the situation from a moral perspective. Some people perceive civil marriage as absolutely natural; for others it is considered a sin. Based on religious studies, it should be recognized that the concept of morality has retained very little of its true meaning. Modern man's idea of morality is distorted and emasculated.
Morality is a purely individual quality, which allows a person to consciously control his own mental and emotional state, personifying a spiritually and socially formed personality. A moral person is able to determine the golden standard between the self-centered part of himself and sacrifice. Such a subject is able to form a socially oriented, value-determined civic and worldview.
A moral person, when choosing the direction of his actions, acts solely according to his conscience, relying on formed personal values and concepts. For some, the concept of morality is the equivalent of a “ticket to heaven” after death, but in life it is something that does not particularly affect the success of the subject and does not bring any benefit. For this type of people, moral behavior is a way to cleanse the soul of sins, as if covering up their own wrong actions. Man is an unimpeded being in his choice, he has his own course in life. At the same time, society has its own influence and is able to set its own ideals and values.
In fact, morality, as a property necessary for the subject, is extremely important for society. This is, as it were, a guarantee of the preservation of humanity as a species, otherwise, without norms and principles of moral behavior, humanity will eradicate itself. Arbitrariness and gradualism are the consequences of the disappearance of morality as a set of principles and values of society as such. The death of a certain nation or ethnic group is most likely if it is headed by an immoral government. Accordingly, the level of living comfort of people depends on developed morality. A protected and prosperous society is one in which values and moral principles are respected, respect and altruism come first.
So, morality is internalized principles and values, based on which a person directs his behavior and performs actions. Morality, being a form of social knowledge and attitudes, regulates human actions through principles and norms. These norms are directly based on the point of view of the impeccable, the categories of good, justice and evil. Based on humanistic values, morality allows the subject to be human.
Rules of morality
In everyday use of expressions, morality has identical meaning and common origins. At the same time, everyone should determine the existence of certain rules that easily outline the essence of each of the concepts. Thus, moral rules, in turn, allow the individual to develop his own mental and moral state. To some extent, these are the “Laws of the Absolute” that exist in absolutely all religions, worldviews and societies. Consequently, moral rules are universal, and their failure to comply entails consequences for the subject who does not comply with them.
There are, for example, 10 commandments received as a result of direct communication between Moses and God. This is part of the rules of morality, the observance of which is justified by religion. In fact, scientists do not deny the presence of a hundred times more rules; they boil down to one denominator: the harmonious existence of humanity.
Since ancient times, many peoples have had the concept of a certain “Golden Rule”, which carries the basis of morality. Its interpretation includes dozens of formulations, but the essence remains unchanged. Following this “golden rule,” an individual should behave towards others the way he treats himself. This rule forms the concept of a person that all people are equal regarding their freedom of action, as well as the desire to develop. Following this rule, the subject reveals its deep philosophical interpretation, which states that the individual must learn in advance to realize the consequences of his own actions in relation to the “other individual”, projecting these consequences onto himself. That is, a subject who mentally tries on the consequences of his own action will think about whether it is worth acting in such a direction. The Golden Rule teaches a person to develop his inner sense, teaches compassion, empathy and helps to develop mentally.
Although this moral rule was formulated in ancient times by famous teachers and thinkers, it has not lost the relevance of its purpose in the modern world. “What you don’t want for yourself, don’t do to someone else” – this is how the rule sounds in its original interpretation. The emergence of such an interpretation is attributed to the origins of the first millennium BC. It was then that a humanistic revolution took place in the ancient world. But as a moral rule, it received its “golden” status in the eighteenth century. This injunction emphasizes the global moral principle according to the relationship to another person within various interaction situations. Since its presence in any existing religion has been proven, it can be noted as the foundation of human morality. This is the most important truth of the humanistic behavior of a moral person.
The problem of morality
Looking at modern society, it is easy to notice that moral development is characterized by decline. In the twentieth century, the world experienced a sudden decline in all laws and moral values of society. Moral problems began to appear in society, which negatively affected the formation and development of humane humanity. This decline reached an even greater development in the twenty-first century. Throughout human existence, many moral problems have been noted, which in one way or another had a negative impact on the individual. Guided by spiritual guidelines in different eras, people put something of their own into the concept of morality. They were capable of doing things that in modern society terrify absolutely every sane person. For example, the Egyptian pharaohs, who were afraid of losing their kingdom, committed unthinkable crimes, killing all newborn boys. Moral norms are rooted in religious laws, adherence to which shows the essence of the human personality. Honor, dignity, faith, love for the homeland, for man, loyalty - qualities that served as a direction in human life, to which part of the laws of God reached at least to some extent. Consequently, throughout its development, society tended to deviate from religious commandments, which led to the emergence of moral problems.
The development of moral problems in the twentieth century is a consequence of the world wars. The era of decline in morals has been going on since the First World War; during this crazy time, human life became devalued. The conditions in which people had to survive erased all moral restrictions, personal relationships devalued just like human life at the front. The involvement of humanity in inhumane bloodshed dealt a crushing blow to morality.
One of the periods when moral problems appeared was the communist period. During this period, it was planned to destroy all religions, and, accordingly, the moral norms embedded in it. Even if in the Soviet Union the development of moral rules was much higher, this position could not be maintained for long. Along with the destruction of the Soviet world, there was a decline in the morality of society.
In the current period, one of the main problems of morality is the fall of the family institution. Which brings with it a demographic catastrophe, an increase in divorces, and the birth of countless children out of wedlock. Views on the family, motherhood and fatherhood, and raising a healthy child are regressing. The development of corruption in all areas, theft, and deception is of certain importance. Now everything is bought, exactly as it is sold: diplomas, victories in sports, even human honor. This is precisely the consequences of the decline in morality.
Education of morality
Moral education is a process of purposeful influence on a person, which involves influencing the consciousness of the subject’s behavior and feelings. During the period of such education, the moral qualities of the subject are formed, allowing the individual to act within the framework of public morality.
Education of morality is a process that does not involve breaks, but only close interaction between the student and the teacher. You should cultivate moral qualities in a child by your own example. Forming a moral personality is quite difficult; it is a painstaking process in which not only teachers and parents, but also the public institution as a whole take part. In this case, the age characteristics of the individual, his readiness for analysis, and processing of information are always taken into account. The result of moral education is the development of a holistically moral personality, which will develop together with its feelings, conscience, habits and values. Such education is considered a difficult and multifaceted process, summarizing pedagogical education and the influence of society. Moral education implies the formation of a sense of morality, a conscious connection with society, a culture of behavior, consideration of moral ideals and concepts, principles and behavioral norms.
Moral education takes place during the period of education, during upbringing in the family, in public organizations, and directly involves individuals. The continuous process of moral education begins with the birth of the subject and lasts throughout his life.
100 RUR bonus for first order
Select the type of work Diploma work Course work Abstract Master's thesis Practice report Article Report Review Test work Monograph Problem solving Business plan Answers to questions Creative work Essay Drawing Essays Translation Presentations Typing Other Increasing the uniqueness of the text Master's thesis Laboratory work On-line help
Find out the price
Behavior is a system of interrelated actions carried out by a subject in order to implement a certain function and requiring its interaction with the environment. The general prerequisites for the behavior of living organisms are: the presence of a subject that has a certain organization that allows it to build an appropriate system of actions; the presence of an object towards which Behavior is directed, since it contains the goal of Behavior; the presence of a specific Behavior program and a mechanism for assessing the effectiveness of its implementation. Depending on the type of organization of the subject, Behavior is distinguished at the biological, psychological and sociological levels; The levels of study of Behavior also correspond to this.
There are generally accepted standards of decency and rules of conduct, compliance with which is the key to successful communication. All these norms and rules can be combined under one term - the culture of human behavior.
The concept of cultural behavior and ethics has existed for many centuries, and in our time has not lost its relevance. This concept includes rules of behavior in society, actions and forms of communication of people, which are based on morality, as well as the internal and external culture of a person. Norms of behavior are a determining factor in the correctness or incorrectness of a person’s actions in society. First of all, the main factor of cultural behavior is good manners, i.e. a person’s willingness to comply with norms of behavior, his goodwill and tactfulness towards others. Ethics and culture of behavior are a kind of standard, a system of rules accepted in society. Etiquette is intended to serve people for everyday communication, representing a set of polite intonations of colloquial speech.
A generally valid definition of morality has not yet been developed, which is explained by a number of reasons: the complexity, substantive variability, and multifaceted nature of this phenomenon; differences in methodological settings of different directions of ethical reflection, etc. Understanding the problematic nature of any definitive experiments, it is still necessary to propose a version of a working definition of morality, which may look like this: morality is a special way of regulating relationships between people, based on the distinction between good and evil.
It is advisable to once again fix the “regulatory idea” or the meaning of morality (stabilization of the human community and the affirmation of the self-worth of man), which should probably be constantly present “behind the scenes” of the structural and functional analysis of this peculiar phenomenon of spiritual existence. In addition, it is necessary to once again make a reservation that the concepts of “morality” and “morality” are used in the book as identical, although in the history of ethics there have been attempts (where there were linguistic possibilities for this) to separate them.
The problem of the specifics of morality (disputed and incomplete, like most ethical problems) is associated, first of all, with such specific features of morality as its extra-institutional nature and the lack of a clear localization. The latter, i.e. a kind of “omnipresence” of morality, its dissolution in all types of human relationships, especially complicates attempts at its strictly scientific research. Understanding the specifics of morality also involves studying the characteristics of its structural components and the uniqueness of its functioning, which, taken together, makes it possible to understand its uniqueness.
Morality has a social and public character; it is determined by social reasons, and therefore is always partial and relates to a specific group (social, national, religious, etc.).
Morality has its expression in a certain law (code), which prescribes or prohibits specific forms of behavior.
Its essence lies in the correlation of a specific act with a given law as with a certain criterion for assessing human behavior. Morality encourages some standards of behavior and condemns others. Compliance with these norms presupposes a certain reward, which has very real forms: from the praise and respect of others to material and other benefits. Moral behavior is motivated by the desire to conform to a certain model and is aimed at oneself (self-affirmation and self-esteem). The other person is perceived here through the prism of my Self - my ideas, my assessments and needs. It is considered as a circumstance of my own life, which may or may not correspond to my ideas, express or not express the proper attitude towards me. As a result, a person perceives and experiences only himself, or rather, what is usually called the image of the Self (his interests, assessments, qualities).
Accordingly, moral norms are always specific, partial (they are recognized only by a certain group) and conditional (depending on the place and time of their use).
Unlike morality, morality is universal, universal and unconditional. It cannot be expressed in final and specific norms and forms of behavior.
Moral behavior is not aimed at obtaining any reward or at observing the law, but at other people and expresses a special attitude towards them. Moral attitude is based on such a perception of the other, in which he acts not as a circumstance in the subject’s life, but as a self-valuable and self-sufficient person.
The ability to see and hear precisely another person, and not oneself in him, is the basis of a moral attitude towards another.
Morality is formed together with the personality of the individual and is inseparable from his Self. Moral behavior is self-sufficient and does not imply any external rewards. A person carries out certain actions not in order to be praised, but because he cannot do otherwise. Moral behavior is not aimed at evaluation, but at the very BEING of another, regardless of his specific qualities or actions (A.S. Arsenyev, 1977). The only moral norm is love for another and treating him as oneself: “love your neighbor as yourself,” “do not do to another what you do not wish for yourself,” and hence the avoidance of violence, contempt, and infringement of another, no matter how was and no matter what he did. For example, a loving mother strives to help and support her child, regardless of his merits or specific actions, sometimes even contrary to her interests.
As emphasized by L.S. Vygotsky (1991), he acts morally who does not know that he is acting morally. Moral actions motivated by compliance with a moral norm are based on “a misconception of moral values as personal merits, as wealth and advantage, causing narcissism and contempt for all “bad” ones” (L.S. Vygotsky, 1991, p. 258) . The true moral behavior of a child, from his point of view, “should become his nature, performed freely and easily” (ibid., p. 265).
Based on these considerations, we can conclude that moral and ethical behavior has different psychological foundations. Moral behavior is aimed at another person and expresses a special attitude towards him as an independent and unique person. This behavior is selfless (the person does not expect anything in return) and universal (does not depend on the specific situation). In contrast, moral behavior is motivated by the desire to conform to a certain model and is aimed at self-affirmation, strengthening one’s moral self-esteem (a person wants to be good and positively assessed). In this case, the other acts as a means of affirming my merits or as an object of my assessment, depending on what he did or did not do for me. This attitude towards the other is pragmatic and partial.
The outstanding Orthodox psychologist and philosopher A. Surozhsky writes: “The fact that we like or dislike another person does not exhaust his essence... But in order to see a person without regard to myself, you need to renounce yourself and your judgments, and then you can see deep and hear another... Seeing and hearing another means to join, to accept into oneself, to experience community with him. To love means to stop seeing oneself as the center and purpose of one’s existence... Then there is no longer self-affirmation and self-justification, but there is a striving for him to be in the fullness of his being” (1999; p. 221).
However, for all their opposition, morality and morality describe a single ethical principle of man. Morality and morality are manifested in similar forms of behavior - these are actions for another and for the benefit of another. Accordingly, the ethical development of a child is a moral development, within which two different lines must be distinguished.
The level of a person’s culture is judged by his behavior. And behavior consists of individual actions that can be assessed from a moral standpoint.
Moral action and its motives. Moral behavior is based on moral consciousness and is the result of the free choice of the individual. A person’s behavior depends on the moral norms, qualities and principles that he has formed. If a person follows the moral standards accepted in society (respects the old, does not offend the weak, does not lie, does not take what belongs to others, etc.), such behavior is considered normal, i.e. relevant standards. Meeting with selfless people, ready to help not only loved ones, but also strangers, who are hardworking, don’t cheat, don’t envy other people’s success, etc., we say: “These are good, virtuous people.” When faced with a person who seeks to make money at the expense of others, who can deceive, steal, and strives for an idle and depraved life, we evaluate him as vicious and immoral.
Human behavior – this is the realization of his relationships to other people, to society and to himself. The structure of moral behavior can be represented in the following diagram.
The central point of moral behavior is act , which characterizes a person’s ability to consciously set goals, choose appropriate means and act independently. Moreover, the goal may be one, but the means to achieve it are different. For example, in order to pass an exam with a positive mark, you need to acquire a certain amount of knowledge on the subject, but you can (with some dexterity) use a cheat sheet. And even if the goal is achieved, these actions will receive different assessments both from others and the student himself.
It is impossible to be virtuous in soul, but deceitful and cynical in behavior. Our actions show who we really are. Any action must be considered in conjunction with its motives, as well as consequences.
The action is preceded by motivation , which plays the role of an impulse, a stimulant to action. The motive precedes the action and continues its action during its commission. This is a very strong regulator of human behavior, no less important than the act itself. For example, in order to conquer a mountain peak, mountaineering athletes are able to overcome enormous difficulties, even risk their lives.
At the same time, motives and actions may not coincide or not correspond to each other from the point of view of their moral basis. “Good intentions” (motives) do not always lead to right actions, and vice versa. sometimes people hide their unseemly actions from loved ones (parents, spouses), guided by the motive that they are doing it for their good, so that they do not get upset. But sooner or later, having learned about the deception, our loved ones will be even more upset because they will stop believing us.
Nevertheless, there are situations in life when people consider deception not only acceptable, but even the only correct behavior. It is considered a feat and valor in war to deceive the enemy, confuse his calculations, and disorient him in order to win the battle.
So, the connection between motive and action is ambiguous. The same motive can push people to different actions; the same line of behavior can be dictated by different motives.
Moral assessment. Assessing the moral level of an individual depends not only on the results, but also on the motives driving his actions. Why, why do I act this way and not otherwise? What do I want to achieve? Why do I need it? Behind these questions is not just an interest in the reasons for a person’s behavior, but also a desire to understand its essence.
Moral assessment plays a major role in the moral regulation of behavior. Moral assessment involves condemnation or approval of a person’s act, behavior, way of thinking or life based on moral requirements.
Every person wants approval, strives for a positive assessment of his actions, both by doing good deeds and by preventing or, as it happens, hiding his bad actions. Public opinion evaluates a person’s behavior (actions) from the point of view of their compliance or non-compliance with the moral requirements accepted in society. If a young person is rude in a conversation with an older person, if a seller sells a product that is obviously of low quality, if a student lies to a teacher or his friends, public opinion condemns them, since their behavior contradicts the moral standards accepted in society.
But external assessment (public opinion) may not coincide with internal assessment (conscience). Many of you probably remember the story “Conscience”, when the girl decided to skip classes. But when she met a first-grader, she sternly asked: “Why are you skipping classes?” And when the boy explained that he was afraid to pass by the dog, she was overcome with shame not so much for the truancy, but for the fact that in the eyes of the kid she appeared as an honest and strict schoolgirl. The strictest judge is conscience, and moral assessment characterizes the correspondence of what a person has done (existent) with how one should do it (ought).
It is also possible to evaluate future actions, for example, when choosing solutions. In this case, assessment acts as the ability to foresee the consequences of an action and, in this capacity, can simultaneously serve as its motivation.
People express their assessment in the form of praise or blame, agreement or criticism, sympathy or antipathy.
"Golden Rule" of Morality. This is a fundamental rule, often identified with morality itself. It says: “Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.” This rule was first clearly formulated in the middle of the 1st millennium BC, simultaneously and independently in different cultures - ancient Chinese, ancient Indian, ancient Greek, while having strikingly similar formulations. Most often it was interpreted as a fundamental moral truth, the most important practical wisdom.
The “golden rule” of morality requires a person in his relations with other people to be guided by such norms, regarding which he could wish that other or even all people would be guided by them. To do this, he needs to mentally put himself in the place of the other (others), and put them in his own place. Would you like to be lied to? So, don't lie to others. Would you like others to help you in difficult times? This means that you yourself should extend a helping hand to those who need it. Therefore, it would also be correct to say: “Do not wish for others what you do not want them to wish for you.” This rule can be formulated as follows: “Treat others as you want them to treat you.”
The “golden rule” of morality is the rule of reciprocity. For the individual himself, it is a moral law that requires certain behavior. For others, we formulate it in the form of a wish: “Act as you want others to act.”
Thus, a moral person establishes a moral law not in order to make demands on other people, but, first of all, in order to strictly follow it as a norm of behavior.
Some conclusions:
1. A person’s behavior expresses his attitude towards other people, society and himself.
2. The central element of moral behavior is an act, which is preceded by a motive, goal setting, and decision making.
3. An action is assessed not only by its results, but also by the motives driving a person’s actions.
4. Moral assessment involves condemnation or approval of an act or human behavior on the basis of moral laws.
5. The “golden rule” of morality requires a person in his relations with other people to be guided by such norms that are suitable for all people and express, so to speak, the general requirement of humanity.
Questions and tasks:
1. What is the structure of a moral act?
2. J.V. Goethe wrote: “Behavior is a mirror in which everyone shows his face.” What elements of the moral structure of personality are the poet talking about here?
3. What is moral assessment?
4. Why, in your opinion, does external assessment of actions, expressed by public opinion, not always coincide with internal self-esteem?
5. How is the “golden rule” of morality formulated? How are its main formulations different?
Morality is an acquired quality of personality, adherence to certain rules with which the decision-making on a particular action in relation to others is consistent. It is almost always based on religious morals, local customs, philosophical views, or family traditions. For many, it seems to be synonymous with morality or ethics. Thus, then What will be moral for some may be considered unacceptable for others. The structure of morality depends on the social direction.
Qualities of moral behavior
Moral behavior presupposes that a person may have certain qualities. Let's take a closer look at them.
Sacrifice
This is the willingness to push personal needs and wants into the background. In its extreme form, sacrifice is the willingness to give one's life to save another person. But this is already an extreme case. There are two main forms of sacrifice:
- Stimulated by external factors, for example, moral teachings, stories about other people's self-sacrifice, heroism, as well as other methods of education. This form is characterized by the presence of a justified sense of duty, as well as a feeling of guilt in case of failure to fulfill it.
- A natural form of sacrifice or self-sacrifice is characteristic of close family ties, where concessions for the sake of a blood family member are prescribed on a subconscious level. This is where natural altruism originates. A frequent manifestation is the assistance and concessions of older family members in relation to their own children and grandchildren. Thus, in conditions of limited supplies, it is the children who receive food first. This mechanism is especially strong between mother and child, where the supremacy of the interests and needs of the second is at the level of instinct.
Justice
This is the compliance of any actions with the norms of the set of rules that a person chooses for himself, as something higher than his own desires. Expressed both personally and in relation to the actions of others. From an emotional point of view, violation of justice itself causes a feeling of guilt and a desire to make amends.
If justice is violated by someone, then emotions vary from indignation to anger (depending on the severity of the act and the reaction of the “violator” to censure). The stumbling block is often different ideas about what is right and what is wrong, because people of different cultures live in the same country.
In such a situation, it is especially important to have a balanced legal framework on the part of the state.
Preliminary awareness of actions
People who live in accordance with any code of rules (regardless of the nature of their origin) before making a decision check their intention with a similar norm in the law that they consider correct. Some do this directly during the events, while others imagine various situations that may occur. Every action is always checked against the norm. In case of non-compliance with the norm, the law prevails among moral people.
Sympathy
By putting yourself in the shoes of another person, it is easier to understand not only his motives, but also how your behavior towards him looks on his part, as well as how he feels at this moment. Thus, we get a look at the situation from two sides at once. This allows you to more fully evaluate your actions. Empathy is one of the qualities valued at different times in many cultures, religions and schools of thought. It is one of the necessary conditions for a healthy society.
Charity
It is an instrument of compassion, through which a person, having delved into the problems of another (and having the opportunity to help him), tries to correct the current situation. By coping with the problems of others, a moral individual manifests his own “I” in one of its highest forms.
Awe
This is a feeling of hypertrophied respect, admiration and gratitude towards traditions, great deeds, as well as their authors from previous generations. Through it, a person dissolves in the culture of society and becomes involved in its views on the world. Reverence serves the purpose of maintaining and raising the bar of morality in society, instructing people to accomplish worthy deeds. It instills fear of low actions under the threat of becoming an unworthy representative of one's culture.
Rules of moral behavior
Thus, for behavior to be moral, the general set of rules can be expressed as follows:
- Before you commit any action, think about what the consequences will be, how it will affect other people, and whether it will harm them. Think about your actions in advance.
- When interacting with another person, think not only about your own interests, but also about the interests of your friend, colleague, or fellow traveler. Someone always takes the first step and gives in first. A good example often resonates, and in its absence it will become clear who the business is being dealt with.
The golden rule of morality is: “act as you would like others to treat you.”
- Pay attention to the problems of others, sympathize with them in difficult times, especially lonely people and those who have no one to expect help from.
- Provide all possible assistance to those who need it. Even a little participation from other people can give strength to someone who finds themselves in a difficult situation.
- Try to act based on informed decisions, based not on someone else's interests. Look at things from an abstract (neutral) perspective, and also watch what other people are doing. For evil to triumph, the inaction of good people is sufficient.
- Be respectful of those who came before you and their deeds, if they were worthy. Try to follow them. Anyone who strives for a high standard may not win the Olympics, but will still be a participant.
The formation of a sense of responsibility should occur in early childhood. Immoral behavior is unacceptable to people. Conscience is a regulator of the behavior of many individuals. In human understanding, spirituality and morality should be present in every person. The basis of etiquette has criteria that define acceptable actions. Basic standards and patterns of moral behavior should be present in every person.
To learn about what morality is and its purpose, see the following video.